Subject: FZ Bible - Level 4 Coursepack [5/7] Repost [x2]
Date: 27 Nov 1999 01:15:08 -0000
From: squirrel@echelon.alias.net (The Tech Lion)
Organization: FreeZone Bible Association
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

Academy Level IV Coursepack: Part 5 of 7

***************************************

Thanksgiving time is here.

We at FZ Bible Association would like to give thanks to Ron for
leaving us a bounty of Tech.

And celebrate by disseminating it freely to all.

In that spirit we bring you the Level 4 coursepack, from the
late 80's.

Happy Turkey Day,

-Tech Lion

********************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

************************

PART 5

17. HCOB   24 Nov. 1965      Search and Discovery

18. HCOB   28 Jan. 1966      Search and Discovery Data, How a
                             Suppressive Becomes One

19. HCOB    5 Feb. 1966      S and D Warning

20. HCOB   10 June 1966 II   S&D -- The Missed Item

21. HCOB   19 Jan. 1968      S&Ds by Button

22. HCOB   19 Nov. 1978      L&N Lists -- the Item "Me"

23. HCO PL 20 Oct. 1976RA    PTS Data

24. HCOB   31 Dec. 1978RA II Outline of PTS Handling

25. HCOB   21 May  1985      Two Types of PTSes
                             C/S Series 121
                             FPRD Series 11

26. HCOB    7 July 1964      Justifications

27. HCOB    8 July 1964      More Justifications

******************************************************************

17. HCOB   24 Nov. 1965      Search and Discovery

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

     HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1965

Remimeo
Required for
  Level IV Students
  and Review Auditors

                LEVEL IV

          SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

      Prerequisite: A knowledge of
      ethics definitions and purposes.

The process called Search and Discovery requires as well a good
knowledge of ethics.

One must know what a SUPPRESSIVE PERSON is, what a POTENTIAL
TROUBLE SOURCE is and the mechanism of how and why a case roller-
coasters and what that is. All this data exists in ethics policy
letters and should be studied well before one attempts a "Search
and Discovery" or further study of this HCOB. Ethics is not
merely a legal action -- it handles the whole phenomena of case
worsening (roller coaster) after processing, and without this
technology an auditor easily becomes baffled and tends to plunge
and squirrel. The only reason a case roller-coasters after good
standard auditing is the PTS phenomena -- a suppressive is
present.

              THREE TYPES

There are three types of PTS.

Type One is the easy one. The SP on the case is right in present
time, actively suppressing the person.

Type Two is harder for the apparent suppressive person in present
time is only a restimulator for the actual suppressive.

Type Three is beyond the facilities of orgs not equipped with
hospitals as these are entirely psychotic.

          HANDLING TYPE ONE PTS

The Type One is normally handled by an Ethics Officer in the
course of a hearing.

The person is asked if anyone is invalidating him or his gains or
Scientology and if the pc answers with a name and is then told to
handle or disconnect from that person, the good indicators come
in promptly and the person is quite satisfied. If, however, there
is no success in finding the SP on the case or if the person
starts naming org personnel or other unlikely persons as SP, the
Ethics Officer must realize that he is handling a Type Two PTS
and, because the auditing will consume time, sends the person to
Tech or Qual for a Search and Discovery.

It is easy to tell a Type One PTS from a Type Two. The Type One
brightens up at once and ceases to roller-coaster the moment the
present time SP is spotted. The pc ceases to roller-coaster. The
pc does not go back on it and begin to beg off. The pc does not
begin to worry about the consequences of disconnection. If the pc
does any of these things, then the pc is a Type Two.

It can be seen that Ethics handles the majority of PTSes in a
fast manner. There is no trouble about it. All goes smoothly.

It can also be seen that Ethics cannot afford the time to handle
a Type Two PTS and there is no reason the Type Two should not pay
well for the auditing.

Therefore, when Ethics finds its Type One approach does not work
quickly, Ethics must send the person to the proper division that
is handling Search and Discovery.

               TYPE TWO

The pc who isn't sure, won't disconnect or still roller-coasters
or who doesn't brighten up, can't name any SP at all, is a Type
Two.

Only Search and Discovery will help.

         SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

The first thing to know is that CASE WORSENING IS CAUSED ONLY BY
A PTS SITUATION.

There never will be any other reason.

As soon as you doubt this datum and think about "other causes" or
try to explain it some other way, you no longer prevent cases
from worsening and no longer rescue those who have worsened.

The second thing to know is that A SUPPRESSIVE IS ALWAYS A
PERSON, A BEING OR A GROUP OF BEINGS. A suppressive is not a
condition, a problem, a postulate. Problems and counter-
postulates come into the matter but the SP as a being or group
must always be located as a being or a group, not as merely an
idea. As the technology is close to and similar to that of a
service facsimile, a poorly trained auditor can get confused
between them and produce a condition he says is the cause.
Persons who cannot confront and who therefore see persons as
ideas not people are the ones most likely to fail in doing Search
and Discovery.

The third thing to know is that there can be an actual SP and
another person or being similar to the actual one who is only an
apparent SP.

An actual SP actually suppresses another.

An apparent SP only reminds the pc of the actual one and so is
restimulated into being a PTS.

The actual SP can be in present time (Type One PTS) or is in the
past or distant (Type Two PTS).

The Type Two always has an apparent SP who is not the SP on the
case, is confusing the two and is acting PTS only because of
restimulation, not because of suppression.

Search and Discovery as a process is done exactly by the general
rules of listing. One lists for persons or groups who are or have
suppressed the pc. The list is complete when only one item reads
on nulling and this is the item.

If the item turns out to be a group, one does a second list of
who or what would represent that group, gets the list long enough
to leave on nulling only one item reading, and that is the SP.

An incident is not a person or a group. A condition is not a
person or a group. And a group is not a person. What you want is
one being.

The E-Meter signs are unmistakable and the good indicators come
in strongly when the actual SP is found.

This is the entire action. It is liable to the various ills and
errors of writing and nulling a list, such as overlisting,
underlisting, ARC breaking the pc by bypassing the item or
getting an incomplete list. These are avoided by knowing one's
business as an auditor and being able to handle an E-Meter with
skill and confidence.

When one goofs on a Search and Discovery and finds the wrong
actual SP, the signs are the same as those where a Type Two is
handled as a Type One -- not sure, no good indicators, roller-
coasters again, etc.

The actual SP can be backtrack but it is seldom vital to go far
out of PT and usual for a this-lifetime person to turn up.

Done correctly the pc's good indicators come in at once, the pc
cognites, the meter reacts very well with blowdowns and repeated
long falls, and the pc ceases to rollercoaster.

Care should be taken not to get too enthusiastic in going far
backtrack on the pc as you run into whole-track implants, etc.,
easily handleable only at Level V. The pc can get "overwhumped"
if you go too far back and you'll wish you hadn't. This normally
happens, however, only when the pc has been ARC broken by the
auditor, when the right item has been bypassed and the list is
overlong, or when two or three items are still reading on the
list (incomplete list).

Locating a service facsimile is quite similar to Search and
Discovery but they are different processes entirely. Only the
doingness is similar. In Search and Discovery the end product is
a being. In service facsimile the end product is an item or
concept or idea. Don't get the two mixed.

           HANDLING TYPE THREE

The Type Three PTS is mostly in institutions or would be.

In this case the Type Two's apparent SP is spread all over the
world and is often more than all the people there are -- for the
person sometimes has ghosts about him or demons and they are just
more apparent SPs but imaginary as beings as well.

All institutional cases are PTSes. The whole of insanity is
wrapped up on this one fact.

The insane is not just a bad off being. The insane is a being who
has been overwhelmed by an actual SP until too many persons are
apparent SPs. This makes the person roller-coaster continually in
life. The roller coaster is even cyclic (repetitive as a cycle).

Handling an insane person as a Type Two might work but probably
not case for case. One might get enough wins on a few to make one
fail completely by so many loses on the many.

Just as you tell a Type Two to disconnect from the actual SP
(wherever found on the track), you must disconnect the person
from the environment.

Putting the person in a current institution puts him in a Bedlam.
And when also "treated," it may finish him. For he will roller-
coaster from any treatment given, until made into a Type Two and
given a Search and Discovery.

The task with a Type Three is not treatment as such. It is to
provide a relatively safe environment and quiet and rest and no
treatment of a mental nature at all. Giving him a quiet court
with a motionless object in it might do the trick if he is
permitted to sit there unmolested. Medical care of a very
unbrutal nature is necessary, as intravenous feeding and
soporifics (sleeping and quietening drugs) may be necessary. Such
persons are sometimes also physically ill from an illness with a
known medical cure.

Treatment with drugs, shock, operation, is just more suppression.
The person will not really get well, will relapse, etc.

Standard auditing on such a person is subject to the roller-
coaster phenomena. They get worse after getting better.
"Successes" are sporadic, enough to lead one on, and usually
worsen again since these people are PTS.

But removed from apparent SPs, kept in a quiet surroundings, not
pestered or threatened or put in fear, the person comes up to
Type Two and a Search and Discovery should end the matter. But
there will always be some failures as the insane sometimes
withdraw into rigid unawareness as a final defense, sometimes
can't be kept alive and sometimes are too hectic and distraught
to ever become quiet. The extremes of too quiet and never quiet
have a number of psychiatric names such as "catatonia" (withdrawn
totally) and "manic" (too hectic). Classification is interesting
but nonproductive since they are all PTS, all will roller-coaster
and none can be trained or processed with any idea of lasting
result no matter the temporary miracle.

Remove a Type Three PTS from the environment, give him or her
rest and quiet, do a Search and Discovery when rest and quiet
have made the person Type Two.

(Note: These paragraphs on the Type Three make good a promise
given in Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health to
develop "Institutional Dianetics.")

The modern mental hospital with its brutality and suppressive
treatments is not the way to give a psychotic quiet and rest.
Before anything effective can be done in this field, a proper
institution would have to be provided, offering only rest, quiet
and medical assistance for intravenous feedings and sleeping
drafts where necessary but not as "treatment" and where no
treatment is attempted until the person looks recovered and only
then a Search and Discovery as above under Type Two.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:ep.cden.gm



******************************************************************

18. HCOB   28 Jan. 1966      Search and Discovery Data, How a
                             Suppressive Becomes One

        HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
  Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

       HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JANUARY 1966

Remimeo
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
All Students
Level IV and above

                 LEVEL IV

         SEARCH AND DISCOVERY DATA
       HOW A SUPPRESSIVE BECOMES ONE

   (Edited from a taped conference with Saint
   Hill Tech and Qual personnel--20 Dec. 1965)

Search and Discovery is being made, and auditors are finding on
one person and another, "myself." Well, just amongst us girls, of
course, you are going to find it. One of the best reasons you are
going to find it is that it is part of the R6 bank. The other
reason you are going to find it is that after a person is totally
overwhelmed by a suppressive he assumes the valence of the
suppressive. And a person you would find that on has actually
been pretty suppressive.

What you're doing is, you are pushing S&D to a point where you
are clearing suppression. It wasn't intended to go that far.

If you were to ask the listing question, however, "Name 'myself'"
or "Give 'myself' a name," you would then get the suppressive.

But this is getting very adventurous, because it is part of the
R6 bank. It is getting very adventurous to do anything about it.
We seem to be happy about having "myself." I would just let them
go right on being happy about it. With skill you probably could
bring out the identity of this person whose valence had come over
them. It would all depend on the auditor who is doing it. If I
were doing it, I'd go ahead and break it down. But not a Class
III Auditor who is not sure what he is going up against, who is
repeating the word several times, repeating the question, trying
to check it to make sure the listing question is clean. Don't you
see, you are never going to get that listing question clean. That
I assure you. That question can't be listed out.

That is the mechanism of suppression -- overwhelming a person.
Oddly enough you will only find it on persons who are suppressive
and of course you've walked into the real mechanism of how does a
suppressive become a suppressive? He becomes a suppressive by
taking over the valence of a suppressive.

Then when you list it out, you get "myself," and this is
compounded by the fact that it's part of the R6 bank so you don't
dare do much with it, but it will let a bunch of steam off the
case.

With some very, very, very, very upstage auditing, very careful
indeed, give them the auditing question once, then say, "Go on
and answer the question" but never repeat it, never check the
thing to find out if it's a clean list-you probably would get at
least one recent SP out of that combination. How we do that at
that stage when I've not worked with it technically I would not
be able to tell you, but I just know that it would be very risky.
It makes me feel like maybe I shouldn't do anything about it at
all because it's too risky, but I can see somebody getting messed
up.

         THE MAIN TROUBLE IN S&D

Your main trouble in S&D is much worse than that -- it is simply
an inability to assess. And auditors since time immemorial have
had trouble assessing. They have two troubles in assessing. They
underlist and they overlist. It's almost an accident that an
auditor ever lists the right lists the right way. I'm not saying
that sarcastically but it has been my experience in teaching
auditors to assess that they have two faults -- they underlist
and they overlist.

If they do either one of these things, they are going to ARC
break the pc and then the list isn't going to be nullable because
the pc is not responding to the auditor's voice as well, and it
quite often was the first one on the list which is where they
never looked. More fundamental than that, is simply the problem
of reading an E-Meter. Those technical facts are in the road of
S&D.

           ASSESSING AN S&D

Actually, an auditor who can assess can pass off an S&D so fast
it would be like dealing cards done by a Monte Carlo Vingt-et-Un
player; he could just roll them off left, right and center.
There's no real trouble in it. It's a very fast action. It all
depends on how much you want to keep the pc under tension in the
action, because an assessment isn't auditing to begin with.

You would start session with "Sit down, I'm going to assess you
now. Do you have some answers to this question? Brr. Brr. Brr."
And the pc says, "I want to tell you about----" "All right, good,
I'm glad you're going to tell me about that but right now I want
some answers to this question." See? Then "brrrrr" on down and
then you'll notice your needle relax. Then you say, "All right,
now I'm going through this list." Ratatat, etc. "That's it, all
right. Thanks very much." Pc cognites ten minutes. Pc cognites
and the meter blows up and good indicators come in, and you've
done an S&D. There is nothing more complicated than that.

You've got auditors who were trying to do an S&D in a session.
You got them that are afraid the pc has already given it on the
list. You got them that haven't learned how the meter reacts when
you've got a complete list. (A meter just falls flat when you've
got a complete list. The needle goes clean.) And you've got them
that aren't sure that they've got any SP, and they just didn't
see that the meter did a surge on one of them. Then you get
somebody who has overlisted and he's just ploughed the guy in, so
he can't assess it back easily.

Then you get the fellow who had four of them fall. Certainly if
you've got four falling there's two things that can be wrong at
this point which makes it very difficult to run back. In one, you
have passed it. It's above the four which are falling. You've
missed it, and the pc is simply discharging on it. And actually
you can ask the pc which one was it and he'll say, "Well, it was
Joe, of course." That's above the four. Practically every one
after the right one will read, because it's actually blowing down
all the time. He's no longer paying any attention to the auditor.

Then the other thing is you just haven't completed the list.

You have to make an opinion as to whether or not you've
overlisted or underlisted. You can also pick up a dirty needle
and an ARC broken pc or protesty pc if you've gone by the right
one.

Here are the evils of listing, and here are the evils of
assessment showing up on S&D. They are simply auditor goofs --
it's just lack of experience on the part of the auditor and lack
of understanding of what he's supposed to be doing. But an
auditor who can really assess can knock these things off. I'd
spot what auditors can assess reliably, and I'd give them
specialized jobs of that character that require listing. This is
a very, very highly skilled action. You save a lot of time by
pulling such an auditor back into specialty.

             REVIEW ACTION

In Review you have to do it sometimes when it's been done. So you
have the additional answer of "How do you patch up an assessment
that's already been goofed?"

And "Where is the list that was lost?" You've got the problem of
the list that was completed out of session. "And I got home and
was lying in bed..." and so forth. So in Review you always assume
the pc continued the list after the session. If the pc is there
as a flat ball bearing, you just automatically assume the pc
thought of it afterwards or something. It isn't that the Tech
auditor always got it.

I'll give you a tip in Qual. If you assume automatically that
standard technology has not been applied, as your first gambit,
in anybody that you're putting back together again, you'll about
99% be right. Somehow or other it slipped by in Tech. It slipped
by. Somebody thought he did it. Somebody thought it was on the
report. And therefore it looked like it didn't work or something.
Something was there. And in all of my D of P-ing I have not found
it possible to detect all departures from tech by auditors. I've
never been able to bat 1000 on that. Naturally, it's nearly
impossible.

Technically, what you have to do doesn't mean that you have to
invent technology because there are very standard answers to all
these things.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:ml.rd.gm



******************************************************************

19. HCOB    5 Feb. 1966      S and D Warning

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 5 FEBRUARY 1966

Remimeo
Tech Div Hats
HGC Auditors
Qual Div Staff
Franchise

                Level III

             S AND D WARNING

Search and Discovery, done incorrectly (incorrect SP found), can
make a preclear ill within a week or two after.

Assessment is a very proper skill. There is a great deal written
on it and many tapes.

The common errors of assessment (aside from the usual gross
auditing errors) are

1. Too short a list

2. Too long a list

3. Clumsy or improper meter handling

4. List getting suppressed

5. Item getting invalidated

6. Pc being allowed too much itsa

7. Pc getting ARC broken by under- or overlisting

8. Auditor not letting the pc have his item

9. Whole list going live because the item was bypassed earlier on
the list

10. Auditor not looking for good and bad indicators to see if he
was correct in his assessment.

When the right SP is found, the good indicators flood in and the
pc does not cave-in in 36 to 72 hours.

The bug in S&D is that one can almost get the right item. An item
can be found that is nearly the right one. If the nearly right
one is accepted, the pc will be doubtfully more cheerful and may
insist this is it. The pc, however, is still not quite sure.
Inevitably that is the sign of a nearly right item.

The real reaction to the correct person is an "Of course!" no-
doubt-about-it reaction.

It is the action of nearly finding the right one that may make
the pc ill in the next few days or a week. One has restimulated
the bypassed charge of the right one without finding it.

Remember that the real suppressive person (SP) was the one that
wove a dangerous environment around the pc. To find that person
is to open up the pc's present time perception or space. It's
like pulling a wrapping of wool off the pc.

The SP persuaded or caused the pc to believe the environment was
dangerous and that it was always dangerous and so made the pc
pull in and occupy less space and reach less.

When the SP is really located and indicated, the pc feels this
impulse not to reach diminish and so his space opens up.

The difference between a safe environment and a dangerous
environment is only that a person is willing to reach and expand
in a safe environment and reaches less and contracts in a
dangerous environment.

An SP wants the other person to reach less. Sometimes this is
done by forcing the person to reach into danger and get hurt so
that the person will thereafter reach less.

The SP wants smaller, less powerful beings. The SP thinks that if
another became powerful that one would attack the SP

The SP is totally insecure and is battling constantly in covert
ways to make others less powerful and less able.

Scientology flies into the teeth of an SP. One will go to the
most extraordinary lengths to try to injure Scientologists or an
organization or a staff member.

But SPs existed long before Scientology and finding the basic SP
around the pc just because of Scientology or the pc is a
Scientologist is in actual fact unlikely.

Childhood is the most fertile area in which to locate the SP on
the case. A child is weak and at the mercy of adults. It is this
fact alone that gave all the cures Freud ever stumbled onto. The
analyst accidentally located an SP when his work was successful.
But then he proceeded to overrun and restimulate the patient
without erasing. In other words, he would not let the patient
have his item. An hour with a meter in the hands of an expert
auditor who can assess correctly will produce everything the
analyst or Freud ever hoped to achieve and will do it invariably
compared to the small results analysts did achieve.

But if you get one almost right, and not get the really correct
SP, then you get the same phenomena that dogged the analyst --
the pc gets better for a moment and collapses.

I am not saying you can permanently injure persons. The analyst
techniques operated far more restimulatively than our S&D. They
made the person talk about it for years!

But you can still give a pc a nasty cold if you miss on an S&D.

So don't miss.

Do it correctly.

Find the correct SP

It's all correct if you assess by the book -- complete list, not
too long or too short. Correct item on the list. Good indicators
then in. And no relapse for at least two weeks.

That's how a real S&D is done.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:ml.rd.gm



******************************************************************

20. HCOB   10 June 1966 II   S&D -- The Missed Item

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

       HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1966
                 Issue II

Remimeo
Tech Div Hats
HGC Auditors
Qual Div Staff

         S&D -- THE MISSED ITEM

There are four points I want to get across to you.

1. ILLNESS = ONLY PTS

2. ONLY PTS = ILLNESS

3. ONLY A PTS CONDITION CAN MAKE A GRADE V (or any grade) SICK

4. A BAD S&D MAKES A PERSON SICK

Get it? GOOD!!

Now, if a person who has had an S&D gets sick, what do you know?
You know that

a. They are a PTS
b. The S&D was not properly done
c. An item was missed.

NOTE: The missed item may be on a list that was made two or three
years ago.

On the HCOB 5 Feb. 66, S&D WARNING, I clearly stated that "It is
the action of nearly finding the right one that may make the pc
ill." One has restimulated the charge of the RIGHT item but has
found and okayed the WRONG item.

A bad S&D is DEADLY.

A bad S&D can cause a dangerous physical condition. A bad S&D can
land a pc in hospital (I know of two such cases where it did).

So please! PLEASE!! get this, it is so very important. Always,
repeat, ALWAYS look for the MISSED item on a priorly done list
when the pc gets sick.

Know your S&D bulletins, know your listing and nulling bulletin
-- THOROUGHLY -- and you won't go wrong.

Let's fix up roller coasters, not help keep them roller-
coastering.

IT'S VERY EASY.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:lb-r.cden.gm



******************************************************************

21. HCOB   19 Jan. 1968      S&Ds by Button

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JANUARY 1968

Remimeo

                   S&Ds

              S&Ds BY BUTTON

The most certain way to handle a pc with an S&D is to assess for
the type to give first.

With the pc on the meter, say "Unmock" (or "Make nothing of")
"Stop" "Withdraw from" "Suppress" "Invalidate" (or any of the
buttons used in old Problems Intensives). Then take the one that
read largest and put it in the question "Who or what has attempted
to ______ you?" or "Who or what are you trying to ______?"

When you have listed the question and found the item and given it
to the pc, you can take the above list, with the one used
omitted, and take the largest read now on the remaining words and
put that in the question and get another item for it.

So long as you can get one of the buttons to read, you can get an
item by doing an S&D with it.

CAUTION: Do not continue to do S&Ds beyond a floating needle.

CAUTION: Do not list an S&D button if the question for the list
does not read.

        S&Ds BY ASSESSMENT FOR QUESTION

You can also do an S&D by assessing for a button to use in an S&D
question.

This is done by asking the question

  "What are they trying to do to you?"

Get the pc to list it, find the item and then use it in an S&D
question.

This works on any case but always works best on cases that
haven't responded to S&Ds previously.

Fit the resulting item in the question "Who or what is trying to
______ you?"

               PURPOSE S&Ds

A Purpose S&D by assessment for question can be done by first
listing "What are you trying to do?" or "What have you tried to
do?" You test these two questions for the largest read, then you
list the one that reads best.

When you have the item of "What are you trying to do?" or "What
have you tried to do?" you fit it into the S&D question "Who or
what have you failed to ______ (item found)?" or "Who or what
have you tried to ______?" the two questions tested for largest
read and then listed for an item.

CAUTION: The question must make sense and be answerable. Don't
change the wording of the item. Change the question into a
sensible one.

This form of S&D can give an effect question as the only possible
question.

If the item found on the first list "______ trying to do" won't
word causative, word it by effect -- "Who or what has tried to
______ you ______?"

The whole attempt of this S&D is to find the person or thing that
has blunted the purpose of the pc.

               ----------

All these S&Ds do not set aside the standard S&D Types W, S and
U. "Type U" is the basic S&D. They are for use mainly when the pc
has had a long review history, or a bad ethics history, or is
insane or suppressive. BUT using them does not evaluate the pc as
downtone. They give rather magical effects on anyone.

The Purpose S&D is from earlier research and is very magical on
artists. It has the liability of having to be done sensibly,
being a sort of goals assessment plus an S&D. Sometimes the goals
assessment ("What are you trying to do") is magical enough to
produce a floating needle. If so, don't ever go past it to the
second question that uses the goal.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.cden.gm



******************************************************************

22. HCOB   19 Nov. 1978      L&N Lists -- the Item "Me"

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 19 NOVEMBER 1978

Auditors, Class
  IV and above
C/Ses, Class IV
  and above

           URGENT -- IMPORTANT

        L&N LISTS -- THE ITEM "ME"

RULE: THE ITEM "ME" MUST BE ACCEPTED ON ANY S&D LIST.

RULE: THE ITEM "ME" MUST NEVER BE REPRESENTED.

The item "Me" on an L&N list must be accepted as the item, as it
is basically the only right item there could be for an identity
or valence list.

The item "Me" often appears on S&D lists or similar L&N lists
which ask for an identity or valence. If it is not accepted, or
if it is represented, it will really mess up the case. (This
includes the pronouns "myself" and "I".)

The right thing to do when the pc gives this item is to accept it
as the item for the list, and do not continue that list or take
any further action with that item.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:clb.gm



******************************************************************

23. HCO PL 20 Oct. 1976RA    PTS Data

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

   HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 OCTOBER 1976RA
          REVISED 25 AUGUST 1987

Remimeo
SSO
DPE
Ethics Officers
PTS/SP Checksheet

     (Also issued as HCOB 20 Oct. 76R,
               same title)

                PTS DATA

Based on a recent pilot, it has become quite obvious that a full
and complete PTS handling would consist of:

A. PTSness handled terminatedly by interview or auditing by a
person trained on the PTS/SP Checksheet.

B. Complete study and pass on the PTS/SP Checksheet.

The correctly located suppressive, and a correct handling of the
situation based on a thorough understanding of the mechanics of
PTS/SP phenomena form the simplicity that is PTS tech. The tech
of locating the suppressive source is also fully covered in the
PTS/SP Checksheet and is a vital prerequisite for PTS handlers.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations

Adopted as official
Church policy by
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL

LRH:CSI:RTRC:nt.lf.gm



******************************************************************

24. HCOB   31 Dec. 1978RA II  Outline of PTS Handling

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

     HCO BULLETIN OF 31 DECEMBER 1978RA
                 Issue II
         RE-REVISED 26 JULY 1986

Remimeo
HCO
Tech/Qual
C/Ses
Auditors
Ethics Officers
De-PTSers
PTS/SP Checksheet

         OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING

  Refs:
  HCOB   31 Dec. 78R III  EDUCATING THE POTENTIAL
    Rev. 26.7.86          TROUBLE SOURCE, THE FIRST
                          STEP TOWARD HANDLING:
                          PTS C/S-1
  HCO PL 20 Oct. 81R      PTS TYPE A HANDLING
    Rev. 10.9.83
  HCOB 24 Apr. 72 I       C/S Series 79
                          Expanded Dianetics Series 5
                          PTS INTERVIEWS
  HCO PL 30 Jan. 83       YOUR POST AND LIFE
  HCOB   20 Oct. 76 II    PTS HANDLING
  HCO PL 20 Oct. 76RA     PTS DATA
    Rev. 25.8.87
  HCOB   17 Apr. 72R      C/S Series 76R
    Rev. 20.12.83         C/Sing A PTS RUNDOWN
  HCOB   23 Dec. 71RA     C/S Series 73RA
    Re-rev. 1.7.85        THE NO-INTERFERENCE AREA
                          CLARIFIED AND RE-ENFORCED
  HCOB   27 July 76       PTS RUNDOWN AND VITAL INFO
                          RUNDOWN POSITION CORRECTED
  Book:
  The Problems of Work    Chapter 6, "Affinity, Reality
                          and Communication"
  HCOB   10 Aug. 73       PTS HANDLING
  HCOB    8 Mar. 83       HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS
  HCOB   16 Apr. 82       MORE ON PTS HANDLING
  HCOB   10 Sept.83       PTSness AND DISCONNECTION
  HCOB   24 Nov. 65       SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
  HCOB    9 Dec. 71RC     PTS RUNDOWN, AUDITED
    Rev. 8.12.78
  HCOB   20 Jan. 72R      PTS RUNDOWN ADDITION
    Rev. 8.12.78
  HCOB    3 June 72RA     PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP
     Rev. 8.12.78
  HCOB   29 Dec. 78R      THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
      Rev. 20.12.83       A MAGICAL NEW RUNDOWN
  HCOB   30 Dec. 78R      SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
      Rev. 6.1.79         PROBLEMS PROCESSES
  HCOB   21 May  85       C/S Series 121
                          FPRD Series 11
                          TWO TYPES OF PTSes

PTS situations can arise at any time during a person's Scientology
auditing or training and must be handled speedily and well to get
the person back on his course of auditing or training. Many
preclears new to Scientology require PTS handling as one of their
first actions.

Auditing or training must not be continued over an unhandled PTS
situation, as processing or study under the duress of suppression
may not produce results.

You do not go on hoping or ignore it or call it something else or
do any other action except handle. Handling PTSness is too easy
to allow for any justification or excuse for not doing so, and
the steps given below lay out the many handlings which can be
used to bring about a full resolution of all PTSness in all pcs.

                EDUCATION

A person who is PTS is often the last person to suspect it. He
may have become temporarily or momentarily so. And he may have
become so very slightly. Or he may be very PTS and have been so
for a long time. But he is nevertheless PTS and we must educate
him on the subject.

The PTS C/S-1, given in HCOB 31 Dec. 78R III, Rev. 26.7.86,
EDUCATING THE POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE, THE FIRST STEP TOWARD
HANDLING: PTS C/S-1, must be done before any other PTS handling
is begun.

This action sets a person up to understand his PTS sit and the
mechanics of it. A thorough PTS C/S-1 is the basis of all
successful PTS handling.

              PTS INTERVIEW

A metered PTS interview per HCOB 24 Apr. 72 I, C/S Series 79, PTS
INTERVIEWS, or a "10 August handling" per HCOB 10 Aug. 73, PTS
HANDLING, done by an auditor in session or an MAA, De-PTSer, D of
P or SSO will, in most cases, assist the person to spot the
antagonistic or SP element. Once spotted, the potential trouble
source must be assisted in working out a handling for that
terminal. (Or more rarely, the PTS may need to disconnect from
that person.)

(If any difficulty is encountered on this step or if the SP
cannot easily be found, the preclear or student is probably not
PTS Type I and should be turned over to an auditor qualified to
handle Type II PTS situations with more advanced PTS tech.)

                HANDLING

Once the antagonistic terminal has been located, a handling is
done to move the PTS person from effect to slight gentle cause
over his situation. This handling is done per a program which
will include whatever is needed to accomplish the result, and
will, of course, vary depending on the person and his
circumstances.

When the antagonistic person exists in present time, in the
physical universe (as opposed to a past-life SP item), a good-
roads, good-weather approach to the antagonistic terminal is
usually what is needed. The handling must be agreed upon by the
potential trouble source and the person assisting him and must be
tailored to put the person at cause over his particular
situation.

Handling may include coaching him along to see how he himself
actually precipitated the PTS condition in the first place by not
applying or by misapplying Scientology basics to his life and
relationship with the now antagonistic terminal.

(Additional references:

  HCOB   10 Aug. 73     PTS HANDLING
  HCOB   24 Apr. 72 I   C/S Series 79
                        PTS INTERVIEWS
  HCOB   24 Nov. 65     SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
  Book:
  The Problems of Work  Chapter 6, "Affinity,
                        Reality and Communication"
  HCOB    8 Mar. 83     HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS
  HCOB   10 Sept.83     PTSness AND DISCONNECTION
  HCO PL 20 Oct. 81R    PTS TYPE A HANDLING
    Rev. 10.9.83

           WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY?

It quite often happens that the persons antagonistic to the
preclear have no real concept of what Scientology is. This can
also be true of a very new Scientologist who then misinforms
others.

The book What Is Scientology? is a very useful tool. The preclear
can send a copy of it to persons antagonistic to him and it will
give them hope that the person will respond better to life or if
they are antagonistic to Scientology can show them what they're
being antagonistic to.

Recommendations that the PTS person obtain and use this book (or
anyone else who wants to inform his friends or get them on the
right road, as the book was not written for the purpose of de-
PTSing people) should be made by the interviewing officer. The
book was specially priced so it would be more generally available
despite the high cost of publishing. It is a large and imposing
book and contains the true answers to all the questions people
might ask and so saves the PTS person or any other person a great
deal of explanation time.

It is quite a formidable weapon when used in that fashion besides
being a good book that Scientologists should own in its own
right.

         BOOKS, TAPES AND FILMS

Scientology: The Fundamentals of Thought, and other basic books,
tapes and films (particularly the film Introduction to
Scientology) are very useful tools. The preclear can send a copy
of a book or tape to the antagonistic person. Or he can bring the
person in to the local org to listen to a tape play or see a
film.

     HOW TO HANDLE FALSE DATA AND LIES

In some cases antagonism stems from false data or outright lies
that the antagonistic person has heard or read.

The handling for this is based on the datum that truth must exist
before lies, and truth blows the lie away as it is later on the
chain.

The handling for a person who has false data on Scientology is to
fill in any vacuum of missing data with factual data about
Scientology and to prove any lies, rumors and false data
encountered to be false.

Any lies are disproven by documenting the truth. For example, if
the lie is that "Scientology is not a religion," this can be
proven to be false with court decisions or documents clearly
stating that Scientology is a religion. (The tech of handling
such is covered in HCO PL 11 May 71 III, PR Series 7, BLACK PR,
and HCO PL 21 Nov. 72 I, PR Series 18, HOW TO HANDLE BLACK
PROPAGANDA.) Packs of such current materials can be obtained
through one's local Ethics Officer or the Director of Special
Affairs in your org.

The truth blows the lie away. And the source of the lie is
rendered unbelievable and any other utterances by that source
will then be discarded.

          CAN WE EVER BE FRIENDS?

Extraordinary successes in handling PTS situations with "Can We
Ever Be Friends?" cassette and booklet occur when these are used.
Many parents, friends, relatives of Scientologists, who, due to
misunderstoods or misinformation, thought they were opposed to
Scientology and its aims have discovered, after listening to this
cassette, that they are in full agreement with it and now give
Scientology their support.

The results available with this cassette cannot be underestimated.
It can be used by itself when communication has really broken
down between the two terminals or in conjunction with other PTS
handling.

              DISCONNECTION

In the rare cases where disconnection is validly indicated in
order to handle the person's PTSness, it should be done exactly
per HCOB 10 Sept. 83, PTSness AND DISCONNECTION.

                 PROGRAM

As a result of interview and the various actions connected with
it as given above and in the referenced issues, the interviewer
must give the person a program to be done by the person. If the
person does not do the program or report his actions on it or the
program results in no real change in the situation, the
interviewing officer must require the person to have auditing on
the subject. Ruds can be flown and/or a PTS RD must be given by a
qualified auditor in the HGC.

Clears and OTs can have ruds flown and can do all the PTS RD
except engram handling.

This is usually followed by a Suppressed Person RD.

                RUDIMENTS

Flying ruds and overts triple or quad flow on the antagonistic
terminal is often done to "get ruds in" and enable the PTS Type A
person to better confront the PTS situation he is faced with.
With a better confront of the situation, he is, obviously, better
prepared to carry out the handling steps of his program
successfully. This would, of course, be done only in session by a
qualified auditor when so ordered by the Case Supervisor.

The above describes the use of rudiments in handling PTS Type A
situations. Note that in cases where a PTS Rundown is needed
rudiments alone are never used as a substitute for the full
rundown.

              PTS/SP COURSE

A full and complete PTS handling would consist of getting the
person through his PTSness and then getting him through the
PTS/SP Course. This must be included as part of the handling, as
otherwise the person will never learn the full mechanics that had
been wrecking his life.

With the knowledge of PTS/SP technical data under his belt, a
person can be at cause over suppressives and is far less likely
to become PTS to anyone in the future.

             THE PTS RUNDOWN

The PTS Rundown is done when preclears who have had standard,
successful PTS handlings roller-coaster at a later date, become
ill, slump after making gains or continue to find additional
terminals they are PTS to.

Or it is done when the person doesn't brighten up with standard
PTS A handling or when he isn't sure of the SP or can't name any
SP at all.

The exceptions are:

1. that the R3RA steps of the PTS RD would not be run on Clears
and OTs (though they may be given the remaining steps of the PTS
RD), and

2. audited actions to handle PTSness would not be done on those
in the No-Interference Area.

Note: Although the PTS RD contains R3RA steps and New Era
Dianetics has been repositioned above Grades 0-IV on the new
Grade Chart, this does NOT limit the PTS RD to those at the level
of NED in their processing. When a person has a PTS condition to
be handled, it is not a matter of whether the person is up to the
level of NED on the Grade Chart but a matter of handling the
condition terminatedly, as the person may not be otherwise
audited or trained over PTSness. This does not preclude the fact
that proper setup for the action must be done, per the four
points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown.

The PTS Rundown is run to the end phenomena of a pc who is
getting and keeping case gains and never again roller-coasters.

        SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN

If after the PTS Rundown, the person feels fine but the persons
suppressing him are still making trouble, then the PTS person
must have a Suppressed Person Rundown.

The Suppressed Person Rundown can produce the wondrous result of
changing the disposition of an antagonistic terminal at a
distance, by auditing the PTS preclear. Where this terminal was
antagonistic, invalidative, hostile or downright suppressive, he
can suddenly have a change of heart and seek to make peace with
the PTS pc.

The end phenomena of this handling is a miraculous restoration of
communication between the estranged terminals originated by the
formerly antagonistic person.

The Suppressed Person Rundown is done after a PTS C/S-1 has been
done, the antagonistic terminal has been located and handlings
have been done on that terminal, and after the PTS Rundown has
been done.

It is not done in the No-Interference Area.

Note that this rundown is for USE, even after the pc himself has
been handled as a case, as this rundown handles the other person,
the SP or antagonistic person, and the pc's relationship to him
in the real physical universe. Where the SP or antagonistic
person exists in present time, this rundown is done on a one-for-
one basis. In such cases, you use it no matter how successful the
PTS handling was.

                SUMMARY

Thus, any full and complete PTS handling consists of.

1. Education (PTS C/S-1)
2. PTS Interview (discovering to what or whom he is PTS)
3. Handling (or in rare cases disconnection, if warranted)
4. PTS/SP Course (can be started earlier)
5. PTS Rundown (if needed)
6. Suppressed Person Rundown (if needed).

These are powerful and precision tools. With them we can handle
our PTS students, preclears and staffs and get resounding one-
for-one successes.

I am counting on you to do this.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations

LRH:RTRC:pm.fa.sep.ja



******************************************************************

25. HCOB   21 May  1985      Two Types of PTSes
                             C/S Series 121
                             FPRD Series 11

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

        HCO BULLETIN OF 21 MAY 1985

Remimeo
C/Ses
Execs
MAAs/EOs
Tech/Qual

        (Also issued as an HCO PL,
           same date and title)

             C/S Series 121
     False Purpose Rundown Series 11

           TWO TYPES OF PTSes

  Refs:
  HCOB 28 Feb. 84    C/S Series 118
                     PRETENDED PTS
  HCOB 17 June 84    C/S Series 118-1
                     EVIL PURPOSES AND FALSE PR
  HCOB  5 June 84    FPRD Series 1
                     FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
  HCOB 29 Dec. 78R   THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
    Rev. 20.12.83    A MAGICAL NEW RUNDOWN
  HCOB  9 Dec. 71RC  PTS RUNDOWN, AUDITED
  HCOB 10 Aug. 73    PTS HANDLING

  Modifies:
  HCOB 24 Apr. 72 I  C/S Series 79
                     PTS INTERVIEWS
  HCOB 17 Apr. 72R   C/S Series 76R
    Rev. 20.12.83    C/Sing A PTS RUNDOWN
  HCOB 31 Dec. 78 II OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING

There are two types of PTSes:

1. Pretended PTS so as to cover up black PR and evil purposes or
justify them, and

2. Actual PTSness.

Although PTSness can cease simply on spotting the person
accurately that one is PTS to, there are two full rundowns to
handle this condition: The PTS Rundown and the Suppressed Person
Rundown.

On pretended PTSness as mentioned in (1) above, your very
reliable clue is that the person says he is PTS to a well-
intentioned person, such as a staff member or a Scientology VIP.
This is almost totally conclusive evidence that you are dealing
with a person with an evil purpose. Thus, he would be programmed
for auditing geared to locating and handling evil purposes. He
won't get any relief from being found "PTS" to a well-intentioned
person. From time to time one sees "PTS finding" of that nature
cropping up. This probably is the first analysis given as to why
and what it is all about. The person who does that has been black
PRing, has O/Ws and probably, under those, evil purposes.

The usual action, when someone is observably roller-coastering
and manifesting a PTS condition, is to interview the person and
find out who he is PTS to. (Ref: HCOB 24 Apr. 72 I, C/S Series
79, PTS INTERVIEWS) If a standard interview is done and the pc
names well-intentioned persons as the people he is PTS to, the
C/S, seeing this, would not order a PTS Rundown. The C/S would
program the case for those auditing rundowns designed to uncover
and blow O/Ws and evil purposes.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:rw.pl.gm



******************************************************************

26. HCOB    7 July 1964      Justifications

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

        HCO BULLETIN OF 7 JULY 1964

Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students

           SCIENTOLOGY III & IV

              JUSTIFICATIONS

The reasons overts are not overts to people are JUSTIFICATIONS.

If you ask a pc what overt he has committed, and then ask him why
it wasn't an overt, you will find that it wasn't an overt and
therefore didn't relieve as an answer because it was all
justified.

One of the powerful new overt processes (as given by me on recent
tapes) is:

1. In this lifetime, what overt have you committed?

2. How have you justified it?

(2) is run flat until the overt given in (1) is knocked out. Then
a new overt is found and (2) is done thoroughly and repetitively
on it.

This is not a new form of process but these are very new
commands.

Note it is not an alternate command. Note that a cycle of action
is completed with question (2) on (1) before you leave off
processing this particular overt. Only when you have all the
justifications and cognitions possible on (1) do you ask for a
new overt from the pc.

This cracks the general irresponsibility the auditor is met with
in trying to get O/W to benefit the irresponsible case.

"In this lifetime" is added because the pc who can't face his
overts not only justifies them but goes way back into his past
lives to find overts instead of getting off the simple this-
lifetime ones.

This is not the same process as plain "What have you done?" in
which any action done by the pc is accepted as the answer.

However, in simple general O/W you will find the pc is not
answering the auditing question but is answering "What have I
done that caused my trouble?" The pc is running "What action that
I have done explains what has happened to me?"

Therefore, running justifications off is a further south process
than any earlier version of O/W and is very effective in raising
the cause level of the pc.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nb.rd.gm



******************************************************************

27. HCOB    8 July 1964      More Justifications

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

        HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JULY 1964

Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students

           SCIENTOLOGY III & IV

           MORE JUSTIFICATIONS

The following list of Scientology justifications was compiled by
Phyll Stevens and several other course students and is issued to
show how one can get around getting off an overt and stay sick
from it.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

        SOME FAMOUS JUSTIFICATIONS

    It wasn't really an overt because...

It wasn't me, it was just my bank.
You can't hurt a thetan.
He was asking for a motivator.
He's got overts on me.
I've got a service fac on that.
His overts are bigger than mine.
My intentions were good.
He's a victim anyway.
I had bypassed charge.
I was just being self-determined.
I've come up to being overt.
It's better than suppressing.
I'll straighten it out next lifetime.
He must have done something to deserve it.
He was dragging it in.
I was in an ARC break.
He needed a lesson.
He'll have another lifetime anyway.
It's only a consideration anyhow.
It's not against my moral code.
Codes are only considerations.
They couldn't have it.
They weren't willing to experience it.
I don't see why I have to be the only one to take responsibility.
It's about time I was overt.
They are only wogs anyhow.
They are so way out they wouldn't realize it.
He's such a victim already, one more motivator won't make any
  difference.
They just can't have 8-C.
I can't help it if he reacts.
He's too critical.
He must have missed W/Hs.
He's a no-effect case anyhow.
I'm above moral codes.
Why should I limit my causativeness just because others can't
  take it.
It was my duty to tell the truth.
You wouldn't want me to withhold.
He must have postulated it first.
He never would have cognited if I hadn't told him.
I'll run it out later.
He'll be getting more auditing.

LRH:nb.rd.gm


